134 Whitechurch Avenue, Edgeware, Middlesex, HA8 6JN
LON/00AQ/LSC/2021/0400 · service charges · Harrow · decided 12 Jun 2024
The tribunal found that the leaseholder was properly notified of the major works and that the £10,480.39 charge for Major Works Enveloping 2016-2017 is payable, with no order for fee refund and no section 20C order.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 23 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £10,480.39 |
| Total found payable | £10,480.39 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
in respect of the service charge year 2020/2021
- outcome
The tribunal therefore finds that the sum of £10,480.39 sought as a service charge in the year 2020/2021
- total demanded
the sum of £10,480.39 is payable by the applicant in respect of service charges relating to Major Works – Enveloping 2016-2017
- total payable
the sum of £10,480.39 is payable by the applicant in respect of service charges relating to Major Works – Enveloping 2016-2017
- s20c
the tribunal determines that it is not just and equitable in the circumstances for an order to be made under section 20C of the 1985 Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.