13/15 Rumbridge Street, Totton, Southampton SO40 9DQ
CHI/43UG/LDC/2020/0035 · dispensation from consultation · New Forest · decided 8 Dec 2020
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the major works, on conditions capping recoverable carpentry charges at £7000 and requiring the landlord to pay 75% of the respondents' reasonable legal costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to pay 75% of the respondents' reasonable legal costs of the application, summarily assessed if not agreed |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprises 6 residential flats and 3 commercial units
- outcome
The Applicant should be granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the
- s20
The Applicant does not assert that any part of the consultation process was followed
- costs
The Applicant do pay 75% of the reasonable legal costs of this application
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.