13 Mount Street, London W1K 2RE
LON/00BK/LDC/2020/0228 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 4 May 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roofing works at 13 Mount Street, but did not decide whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Forextra Developments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property contains four flats owned by the Respondents
- freeholder
Forextra Developments Limited
- outcome
I determine that dispensation should be granted from the consultation requirements under s20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
I determine that dispensation should be granted from the consultation requirements under s20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.