13-14 Kings Gardens, Hove, BN3 2PG
CHI/00ML/LDC/2022/0074 · dispensation from consultation · Brighton and Hove · decided 23 Nov 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs to stop water penetration, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | 13-14 Kings Gardens (Hove) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Hobdens Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block, 17 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
It was converted in to 17 apartments of varying sizes and service charge apportionments.
- freeholder
Applicant : 13-14 Kings Gardens (Hove) Limited
- agent
Representative : Hobdens Property Management Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal grants an order dispensing with the consultation requirements in respect of the works to the roof pursuant to section 20ZA of the 1985 Act.
- s20
The Tribunal grants an order dispensing with the consultation requirements in respect of the works to the roof pursuant to section 20ZA of the 1985 Act.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.