Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near GL50 3EQ

127 St George's Road, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire GL50 3EQ

CHI/23UB/LSC/2023/0026 · service charges · Cheltenham · decided 28 Jul 2023

The Tribunal dismissed the leaseholder's service charge application because the dispute was between the freeholder company and its managing agent, not between the landlord and tenant.

OutcomeDismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordFromefield Management Company Ltd
Management companyFromefield Management Company Ltd
Managing agentFraser Allen Limited
BuildingOne flat, 3 flats
Service charge years in dispute2020, 2021
Items in disputenot stated
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The property 127 St George’s Road is a converted house comprising three flats.
freeholder
Respondent : Fromefield Management Company Ltd
agent
dispute between the freeholder and its managing agent, Fraser Allen Limited
years
The Applicant seeks a determination of service charges for the years 2020 to 2021.
outcome
The Tribunal dismisses the Application on the ground that there is no dispute between the Applicant and the Respondent.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.