125 Croydon Road, Penge, London, SE20 7TT
LON/00AF/LCP/2019/0004 · LCP · Bromley · decided 25 Mar 2019
The tribunal decided that the RTM company must pay the landlord's managing agent £400 plus VAT for work on the right to manage claim, and that the landlord's own costs of the proceedings cannot be awarded.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Eagerstate Limited |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | management fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant cannot recover its costs of the proceedings; section 88(3) prevents the Tribunal awarding them |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Assethold Limited
- agent
management agreement between Assethold Limited and Eagerstate Limited dated 20 February 2018
- outcome
the Tribunal has decided on a balance of probabilities that the manager's costs in the sum of £400.00 plus Vat is recoverable.
- costs
the effect of section 88(3) of the Act is that the Tribunal cannot award any part of them
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.