123 Westbourne Park Road, London, W2 5QL
LON/00BK/LDC/2025/0935 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 1 Apr 2026
The Tribunal granted the managing agent unconditional dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for emergency damp investigation and remedial works costing £4,511.70 including VAT, while making no finding on the cost or standard of the works.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Acrecourt Limited |
| Management company | Uniq Block Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Uniq Block Management Limited |
| Building | One flat, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £4,511.70 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
which has been converted into 5 flats
- freeholder
The Landlord is Acrecourt Limited.
- agent
The Applicant, Uniq Block Management Limited, is the managing agent appointed by the Landlord.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants unconditional dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA in respect of the Works required at the Premises
- total demanded
costing £4,511.70, including VAT
- s20
The Tribunal grants unconditional dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.