122a Becket Road, Worthing, West Sussex BN14 7ET
CHI/45UH/LDC/2018/0095 · dispensation from consultation · Worthing · decided 18 Mar 2019
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the 2017 exterior redecoration and major works, on condition that £350 is paid to the leaseholder for legal advice costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017 |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay £350 to the applicant |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
Major works, including exterior redecoration, were carried out in 2017.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all or any of the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the major works
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all or any of the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the major works
- costs
subject to the payment of £350 to Mrs [name].
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.