12 Turner Street, Leicester LE1 6WY
BIR/00FN/LDC/2018/0011 · dispensation from consultation · Leicester · decided 24 Jan 2019
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the 2018 floor joist works at 12 Turner Street, so the full cost is not capped at £250 per leaseholder, though the leaseholders can still challenge whether the charges are reasonable and payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | JH Watson Property Investment Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a terrace house of 2 storeys containing 4 flats
- freeholder
Applicant : JH Watson Property Investment
- years
The 2018 works of £2100 equate to a cost of £525 per leaseholder and so are qualifying works.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation in respect of the 2018 works.
- s20
the Tribunal finds it is reasonable to grant the dispensation requested in respect of the 2018 works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.