12 St Georges Court, Nottingham, NG16 4EH
BIR/17UB/LIS/2021/0048 · LIS · Amber Valley · decided 18 Nov 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal reduced some service charges for 2017 to 2020 for insurance, repairs, and professional fees, found the demands invalid for lacking required information, and limited the landlord's recoverable proceedings costs to 75 per cent through the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Imperial Decorating Company Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | St Georges Court (Langley Mill) Limited |
| Building | One flat, 12 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance, legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising of six retail units and 12
- freeholder
Respondent : The Imperial Decorating Company Ltd
- agent
a company called St Georges Court (Langley Mill) Limited
- years
1 May 2019 – 30 March 2020
- outcome
the Applicants secured a reduction in the amounts of service charges payable of £34.52 each for 2017/18
- items reduced
we therefore allow £2,145.80 as the insurance premium for this year instead of £2,260.00.
- s20c
twenty-five per cent (25%) of any legal costs arising from these proceedings
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.