12 Marina Place, Old Bridge Street, Hampton Wick, Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey, KT1 4BH
LON/00BD/LBC/2023/0002 · breach of lease · Richmond upon Thames · decided 12 Jun 2023
The tribunal found that the leaseholder breached the lease by parking two cars in spaces 85 and 86 between August 2022 and March 2023, and ordered him to repay the landlord's £300 tribunal fees.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | HNA No 1 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Marina Place Limited |
| Building | One flat, 15 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to refund tribunal fees of £300 to the applicant within 28 days |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Building consists of 15 flats.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that for the purposes of section 168(4) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, the Respondents have beached the terms of their lease by parking two cars
- costs
the Tribunal orders the Respondent to refund the tribunal fees of £300, which have been paid by the Applicant, within 28 days of the date of this decision.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.