12 Lascotts Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8JN
LON/00AP/LDC/2022/0039 · dispensation from consultation · Haringey · decided 18 Jul 2022
The tribunal retrospectively dispensed with the section 20 consultation requirements for emergency roof repair works carried out at the property, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Together Property Management |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
Representative : Together Property Management
- outcome
(1) The requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 are hereby dispensed with, in respect of the roof repair works specified in the Application and referred to below
- s20
In light of the facts, the Tribunal considers it reasonable retrospectively to dispense with the section 20 requirements in respect of the works carried out concerning the repair of the roof as stipulated above.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.