12 Eastcroft Court, Albury Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 2BU
CHI/43UD/LBC/2021/0006 · breach of lease · Guildford · decided 30 Oct 2021
The tribunal found breaches of clause 3(5) of the lease for unconsented structural, non-structural and decorative works to the flat, but held that the consumer unit in the hallway cupboard and the front door were not part of the demised premises, and declined to award costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Eastcroft (Guildford) Management Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | management fees, utilities, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Applicants : [name] (Guildford) Management Ltd
- outcome
Tribunal determines under s.168(4) of the 2002 Act that there were the following breaches of clause 3(5) of the Lease
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.