Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Search

12 & 12A High Street, Dereham, Norfolk

CAM/33UB/LUS/2025/0002 · LUS · Breckland · decided 13 May 2026

figures not yet checked

The tribunal determined that accrued uncommitted reserve fund service charges for the whole development stood at £76,158.88 as at 1 February 2024, and that the Second Respondent must pay the right to manage company 17.18% of that sum, namely £13,084.09.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedRTM company
Freeholder / landlordK Gray Plumbing & Heating Engineers Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 3 flats
Service charge years in dispute2023, 2024
Items in disputereserve fund
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
the 3 residential flats on the upper floors
freeholder
The Second Respondent is the freeholder of Aldiss Court
outcome
Accordingly, we determine that the amount of accrued uncommitted service charges by way of reserve fund as at 1 February 2024 for the whole Development was £76,158.88.
total payable
is 17.18% of £76,158.88, namely £13.084.09

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.