12, 19A, 27, 32B, 41 & 48 Lenwood Country Club, Northam, Bideford, Devon EX39 3PN
CHI/18UC/LSC/2019/0113 · service charges · Torridge · decided 12 May 2020
The tribunal reduced most of the service charges for 2017/18 to 2019/20 at Lenwood Country Club, disallowed council tax, the finance charge and several other heads, found the 2019 road-repair demand and July 2019 insurance contribution not payable, and ordered the respondent to reimburse £421.90 in fees.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Ground Rent Trading Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Moreland Property Group Limited |
| Building | A block, 59 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant £421.90 (application and hearing fees) |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
each is obliged to contribute 1/59 share of the service charge
- freeholder
Respondent : Ground Rent Trading Limited.
- agent
He describes himself as “Shmuli ([name]) [name] Solicitor and In-House Counsel Moreland Property Group Limited”. [Page 63]
- years
Service charge year ending 30 September 2017 (16/17). Actual service charge payable
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that this charge is not recoverable by the Respondent and cannot be included within the service charge for this year.
- items reduced
Nothing will be allowed in respect of Sundries as there is no evidence of any expenditure which might fall within such a heading.
- costs
the Respondent would reimburse the Applicant £421.90 (which included both the Application and Hearing Fee).
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.