12-16 (Even) Fitzroy Street, London W1T 4BL
LON/00AG/LBC/2025/0604 · breach of lease · Camden · decided 13 Jul 2026
The tribunal dismissed most of the applicant's repair and nuisance allegations against the landlord's management company as not proved, but found a breach of the user covenant in clause 2(7) by permitting short-term Airbnb-style lets of Flat 2 on two dates.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 41 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
41 long leaseholds, each relating to the residential flats above the ground floor.
- freeholder
Interested Parties (1) Old Oak Property Holdings Limited
- outcome
67. The tribunal finds the respondent has breached clause 2(7) of the lease by permitting Flat 2 to be used for short-term Airbnb on 29 January 2024 and 15-17 September 2025.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.