12, 13 and 14 Connaught Place (also known as Stanhope House), London W2 2ET
LON/00BK/LDC/2020/0034 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 14 May 2020
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for replacing the communal hot water and heating boilers at Connaught Place (Stanhope House), while leaving leaseholders free to challenge the cost and standard of the works later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Westbury Residential |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
[name] Residential, (managing agents)
- outcome
I determine that dispensation should be granted from the consultation requirements under s20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
I determine that dispensation should be granted from the consultation requirements under s20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.