11b Modder Place Putney London SW15 1PA
LON/00BJ/LSC/2023/0226 · service charges · Wandsworth · decided 3 Jan 2024
The tribunal found the sinking fund demands for 2020 to 2023 payable under the lease and reasonable in amount, held the section 20 notice valid at service, and declined the section 20C applications, as the respondent had no legal costs to add to the service charge.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
In relation the years 2020-2023 the only item disputed by the Applicant is the amount demanded in respect of the sinking fund.
- outcome
The Tribunal finds the sums demanded by the Respondent in respect of contributions to a sinking fund for the years 2020-2023 inclusive are permissible under the terms of the lease and reasonable in amount.
- s20c
The Applicant's requests for orders under s20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and Schedule 11 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 are declined.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.