11B, 10H & others Arlington House, All Saints Avenue, Margate, Kent CT9 1XP

CHI/29UN/LSC/2022/0044 · service charges · Thanet · decided 31 Oct 2022

figures not yet checked

The tribunal dismissed the leaseholders' challenge to the 2019 service charges for lack of jurisdiction because the respondent had removed the disputed items and repaid them, and refused the request for a section 20C order.

Outcome	Dismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Refused
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	A block, 142 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2019
Items in dispute	other
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: containing 142 self-contained flats
years: the service charges demanded in respect of the year 2019
outcome: The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to deal with the Applicants’ application
s20c: The Applicants have failed in both aspects of their claim

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.