119 Priory Road, Hastings, East Sussex, TN34 3JG
CHI/21UD/LDC/2022/0024 · dispensation from consultation · Hastings · decided 4 Apr 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the remaining statutory consultation requirements for installing a Grade A fire alarm system at the property, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Kline Howell Finance Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Applicant describes the property as a 4-unit conversion property containing 4 flats.
- freeholder
Applicant : Kline Howell Finance Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the remaining consultation requirements of S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the installation of a Grade A Fire Alarm System.
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the remaining consultation requirements of S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the installation of a Grade A Fire Alarm System.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.