Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near B23 7SH

119 George Road, Erdington, Birmingham, B23 7SH

BIR/00CN/LAC/2022/0002 · administration charges · Birmingham · decided 26 Jul 2022

figures not yet checked

The landlord withdrew the £90 administration fee and £720 legal costs, and the tribunal ordered it to pay the tenant £119 in costs under rule 13, rejecting most of the costs claimed.

OutcomeWithdrawn
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not clear
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordStratton Oakmont Estates Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeadministration charges
Items disallowed or reducedadministration charges
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe respondent to pay the applicant £119.00 costs and disbursements under rule 13(1)(b)

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : Stratton Oakmont Estates Limited
outcome
our client agrees on a commercial basis to waive the administration fee
items reduced
our client agrees on a commercial basis to waive the administration fee
costs
The Respondent shall pay the Applicant the sum of £119.00 costs and

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.