119 George Road, Erdington, Birmingham, B23 7SH
BIR/00CN/LAC/2022/0002 · administration charges · Birmingham · decided 26 Jul 2022
figures not yet checkedThe landlord withdrew the £90 administration fee and £720 legal costs, and the tribunal ordered it to pay the tenant £119 in costs under rule 13, rejecting most of the costs claimed.
| Outcome | Withdrawn |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Stratton Oakmont Estates Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant £119.00 costs and disbursements under rule 13(1)(b) |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Stratton Oakmont Estates Limited
- outcome
our client agrees on a commercial basis to waive the administration fee
- items reduced
our client agrees on a commercial basis to waive the administration fee
- costs
The Respondent shall pay the Applicant the sum of £119.00 costs and
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.