117-131 (Odds) The Cherry Building and 133-171 (Odds), Great East Court, Addenbrookes Road, Cambridge CB2 9BA
CAM/12UB/LDC/2021/0018 · dispensation from consultation · Cambridge · decided 24 Oct 2022
The tribunal granted dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the additional works and for the pipework and valves in the further works, but refused it for the replacement boiler heat exchangers, limiting that cost to £250 per flat, and made the landlord bear its own dispensation costs and the leaseholders' reasonable costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | RMB 102 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 8 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant pays the reasonable costs of the leaseholders and bears its own dispensation application costs |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
containing 8 purpose-built Apartments, and 133-171 (Odds) Addenbrookes Road, containing 20 purpose-built Apartments
- freeholder
Applicants (Landlord) : RMB 102 Limited
- agent
Premier Estates (“Premier”) were appointed in Flaxfields’ place
- years
On 30th June 2021 an Application, case number CAM/12UB/LDC/2021/0026
- outcome
1. The Tribunal determines that with regard to the Further Works it is not reasonable
- items reduced
the cost is limited to £250.00 per flat
- s20
1. The Tribunal determines that with regard to the Further Works it is not reasonable
- costs
The Tribunal makes it a condition that the Applicant pays the reasonable costs of the [name].
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.