117-131 (Odds) The Cherry Building and 133-171 (Odds), Addenbrookes Road, Cambridge CB2 9BA
CAM/12UB/LSC/2021/0061 · service charges · Cambridge · decided 16 May 2022
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal refused to review its original decision that the flue replacement costs were payable, but on review it made a partial section 20C order that 20% of the landlord's costs cannot be passed through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | RMB 102 Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Flaxfields Ltd |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £13,954.08 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
the reversion to the long leases in the Property was assigned to the Respondent, RMB 102 Ltd, on 26th July 2019
- agent
appointed Flaxfields Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal makes an Order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that 20% of the Respondent’s costs in connection with these proceedings should not be regarded as relevant costs
- total demanded
The application to determine the reasonableness of the service charges is limited to the Works in the sum of £13,954.08.
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an Order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that 20% of the Respondent’s costs in connection with these proceedings should not be regarded as relevant costs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.