Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near RM8 1BA

116-138 Whalebone Lane South, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 1BA

LON/00AB/LDC/2023/0089 · dispensation from consultation · Barking and Dagenham · decided 1 Dec 2023

The tribunal granted the council landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the roof replacement, compartmentalisation, asbestos soffit and gutter works at the block, leaving any challenge to the cost or quality of the works to a later section 27A application.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 12 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputemajor works
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£312,063
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
is a three storey, purpose built block of 12 flats
outcome
grants dispensation from the consultation requirements in respect of the works the subject of the application
total demanded
the total cost for the works is given as £312,063.
s20
grants dispensation from the consultation requirements in respect of the works the subject of the application

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.