115 Matilda House, St Katherines Way, London E1W 1LF
LON/00BG/LSC/2019/0333 · service charges · Tower Hamlets · decided 10 Dec 2019
The Tribunal decided it has jurisdiction to determine whether the leaseholder's service charge apportionment based on gross rateable values is reasonable, with the substantive issue to be decided later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 133 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 133 flats built around a number of staircases.
- years
service charge years 2014/5, 2015/6, 2016/7, 2017/8, 2018/9 and 2019/20
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that it has jurisdiction to determine whether the Applicant’s service charge contribution is a “reasonable proportion”.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.