Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near ME8 8NP

112B Wakely Road, Rainham, Kent ME8 8NP

HAV/00LC/LSC/2025/0730 · service charges · Medway · decided 7 May 2026

The tribunal found that the landlords had no right to recover service charges or rent before acquiring the freehold in April 2024, that the 2024 demand was not valid, that the £125 monthly interim charge was not reasonable, that roof works costs are limited to £250 because the landlords did not follow the consultation process, and it granted the leaseholder's application to stop the landlords' litigation costs being charged to the service charge.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationConsultation failure found
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat, 3 flats
Service charge years in dispute2018, 2019, 2020
Items in disputemajor works, other
Items disallowed or reducedmajor works, other
Total demanded£4,000
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe respondents to reimburse the applicant's Tribunal fees

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
There are three flats in total in 112 Wakeley Road, Flats 112a, 112b and 112c.
years
the service charge years 2018, 2019, 2020,
outcome
the respondents, as landlords, are limited to recovering £250
items reduced
the respondents’ demand for an interim service charge instalment of £125 per month was not a sum the respondents could reasonably require under the lease
total demanded
a service charge demand for Flat 112b for £4,000 for a one-off payment for the years 2015-2024
s20c
The Tribunal determines that it is just and equitable in the circumstances
s20
The Tribunal finds that the respondents did not comply with the consultation requirements of s.20 LTA 1985 with regard to the roof works
costs
the Tribunal orders the respondents to reimburse the applicant for any Tribunal fees paid by the applicant

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.