112 Runnels Lane, Sefton, Liverpool L23 1UY
MAN/00CA/LSC/2020/0009 · service charges · Sefton · decided 20 Aug 2020
The tribunal found the leaseholder must pay the landlord's service charge arrears of £1918.63 for insurance and repairs, as the costs were reasonable and the account accurate.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £1,918.63 |
| Total found payable | £1,918.63 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a ground floor flat in a two storey block of 4 flats
- years
The Respondent shall pay the Applicant service charges for the period ending 23 September 2019 in the sum of £1918.63.
- outcome
The Tribunal finds that the costs incurred by the Applicant are reasonable and that the service charge account is accurate. The balance shown on the account is therefore payable by the Respondent.
- total demanded
which amounted to £1918.63 as at 23 September 2019
- total payable
The Respondent shall pay the Applicant service charges for the period ending 23 September 2019 in the sum of £1918.63.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.