112 No. 1 Gunwharf Quays, Portsmouth PO1 3FS
HAV/00MR/LSC/2025/0778 · service charges · Portsmouth · decided 19 Jun 2026
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the 2025 air cooling system repair charge payable in full, holding that the works were within the lease, there was no right to opt out or switch to metered charging, and the 6.67% proportion applied.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Gunwharf Quays (Eastside Plaza) Management Company Limited |
| Management company | Gunwharf Quays (Eastside Plaza) Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 20 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2025 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £17,427.93 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property forms part of a building of 20 flats which are served by a centralised ACS.
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] ([name])
- years
a service charge demand for the year 2025,
- outcome
The sums challenged are payable in full.
- total demanded
in the sum of £17,427.93
- s20c
the Tribunal is not satisfied that it is just and equitable to make an order under section 20C.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.