Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near W12 9BL

112 Askew Road London W12 9BL

LON/00AN/LVT/2021/0002 · LVT · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 14 Jan 2022

figures not yet checked

The tribunal refused to vary the apportionment of service charges under section 35 of the 1987 Act because it found no jurisdiction on the ground argued, made no decision on the proposed repairing-obligation variation, and made no section 20C order.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordLindmead Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 3 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputecleaning and grounds, insurance, other, repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
made between Lindmead Ltd (the Lessor) and Villachase Limited (the lessee)
outcome
The tribunal determines not to vary the definition of maintenance rent in the applicants’ leases under s.35 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.
s20c
The tribunal determines not to make such an order.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.