111b Guildford Street, Chertsey, Surrey, KT16 9AS
CHI/43UG/LSC/2022/0068 · service charges · Runnymede · decided 9 Jan 2023
The tribunal found that the repair and decorating works to the building in October 2018 were reasonably incurred, so the leaseholder's challenge failed.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Jonglore Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £4,381.55 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
two long leasehold residential units above
- freeholder
Respondent : Jonglore Properties Limited
- years
undertaken to the Property in October 2018
- outcome
the service charge payable in respect of the repair and decorating works undertaken to the Property in October 2018 was reasonably incurred.
- total demanded
the Applicant was then asked for her 25% share of the total, namely £4,381.55.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.