110 The Quay, Newfoundland Way, Portishead, BS20 7QF
HAV/00HC/LDC/2025/0677 · dispensation from consultation · North Somerset · decided 23 Jan 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent fire alarm remedial works, finding that the leaseholders had shown no prejudice from the shortened consultation, although it made no decision on whether the costs were reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Adriatic Land 3 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Principle Estate Management |
| Building | One flat, 100 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £59,533.26 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] 3 Limited
- agent
the Applicant’s managing agents, Principle Estate Management
- outcome
the Tribunal is prepared to unconditionally waive the requirements under paragraph 4 of Part 2 of Schedule 4
- total demanded
at a total price of £59,533.26 inclusive of VAT
- s20
it did not serve a statement of estimates prior to instructing a contractor
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.