11 Dovey Lodge, Bewdley Street, London, N1 1HG
LON/00AU/LSC/2019/0101 · service charges · Islington · decided 29 Jul 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the interim service charges of £660.00 payable, but the £258.00 administration charge was not recoverable and the landlord's contractual costs were refused, with the tenant ordered to pay £185.00 in court costs.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Smartbourne Property Management Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | £660 |
| Total found payable | £660 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay costs of £185.00 including VAT |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Smartbourne Property Management Ltd 1st Claimant
- years
The landlord’s claim is for interim service charges falling due on 25 December 2017 and 25 March 2018.
- outcome
The tribunal concluded that the tenant was under no obligation to paint the exterior of the windows of the flat.
- items reduced
Accordingly, the landlord could not recover the cost of the administration charge from the tenant.
- total demanded
(i) Service charges: £660.00.
- total payable
(i) Service charges: £660.00.
- costs
The Defendant shall pay to the Claimant by 4.00 PM 28 August 2019 the sum of £185.00 including VAT in respect of the Claimant’s summarily assessed costs;
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.