11 Albert Hall Mansions, Kensington Gore London SW7 2AL
LON/00BK/LSC/2022/0215 · service charges · Westminster · decided 5 Apr 2023
The tribunal dismissed the Applicant's application for its costs of the proceedings under Rule 13, finding that the Respondents had not acted unreasonably in defending or conducting the case.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £30,855 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
Accordingly, the tribunal finds that the Applicant’s application for costs fails.
- total demanded
The amount in issue was £30,855 plus interest.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 23 Dec 2022.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.