10a Teddington Park Road, TW11 8ND
LON/00BD/LSC/2024/0504 · service charges · Richmond upon Thames · decided 3 Jan 2025
The tribunal found that the insurance, water mains and works charges were not currently payable because no formal demand had been made and the statutory consultation requirements had not been met, and the respondent must pay the £220 hearing fee.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | Respondent to pay Applicant £220 hearing fee |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The building has been converted into two flats, one on each storey.
- outcome
The amount outstanding in respect of Buildings Insurance is not payable
- items reduced
The cost of the works to the water mains is not payable by the Respondent.
- s20
she had not complied with the statutory obligations regarding consultation with the Respondent
- costs
The Respondent is to pay to the Applicant the sum of £220.00
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.