106 Church Road, London, SE19 2UB
LON/00AH/LRM/2022/0040 · right to manage · Croydon · decided 21 Feb 2023
The tribunal decided that the building at 106 Church Road is a self-contained building, so the RTM company was entitled to acquire the right to manage, and the respondent must refund the £100 tribunal fee.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | 106 Church Road RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse tribunal fee £100 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
This includes the leases for the six flats in the Premises.
- freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Limited
- management company
Applicant : 106 Church Road RTM Company Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that on 10 November 2022, the Applicant was entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises pursuant to section 84(5)(a) of the Act
- costs
the Respondent shall pay the Applicant £100 within 28 days of this Decision, in respect of the reimbursement of the tribunal fees paid by the Applicant.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.