106-110 Edmund Street and 29 Newhall Street, Birmingha, B3 2ES
· other · Birmingham · decided 15 Jan 2020
The Tribunal dismissed the landlord's application for approval of proposed repair and improvement works costing about £297,611.42, because the chain of title, the parties' liabilities and the consultation information were insufficient, and it invited a fresh application.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Rochda Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 16 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £297,611.42 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
redeveloped as a public house on the ground floor and 16 self-contained flats above
- freeholder
Applicant : Rochda Ltd.
- outcome
1 The Application is dismissed.
- total demanded
the sum of £297,611.42 including VAT
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.