105 Pritchards Road London E2 9AW
LON/00AM/LDC/2022/0011 · dispensation from consultation · Hackney · decided 17 May 2022
The tribunal granted the RTM company dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent and necessary works to the lift at 105 Pritchards Road, with reasonableness of the cost not considered.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Warwick Estates |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £12,194.91 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprises a purpose built four storey block of fourteen flats with a communal lift
- agent
Warwick Estates on behalf of the applicants
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all of the consultation requirements
- total demanded
The cost of the work to be charged was £12,194.91 including VAT.
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all of the consultation requirements under S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in relation to works to the lift
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.