105 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3LE
LON/00AW/LDC/2022/0218 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 21 Oct 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent scaffolding and water leak repair works to Flat 3, while making no findings on the reasonableness or payability of the costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Welcome Trust Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 10 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There is a ground floor commercial unit with ten flats above.
- freeholder
Landlord : The Welcome Trust Ltd C/O [name]
- outcome
Dispensation in respect of costs of scaffolding to access the rear of the property and remedying a water leak to Flat 3 is GRANTED UNCONDITIONALLY.
- s20
Dispensation in respect of costs of scaffolding to access the rear of the property and remedying a water leak to Flat 3 is GRANTED UNCONDITIONALLY.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.