104 Sackville Court, Sackville Crescent, Romford, Essex, RM3 0ED
LON/00AR/LSC/2020/0096 · service charges · Havering · decided 24 Feb 2021
The tribunal found the electrical works charges of £3,600 payable in full, granted dispensation from the unmet consultation requirements, and refused the applicants' cost applications.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Remise Investments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £18,000 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
block of 6 purpose-built flats
- freeholder
Respondent : Remise Investments Limited
- outcome
The charges disputed by the Applicants are payable in full.
- total demanded
their aggregate share being £3,600 out of a total charge of £18,000
- s20c
The Applicants’ cost applications are refused.
- s20
the tribunal dispenses with those of the statutory consultation requirements which were not complied with by the Respondent.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.