101-2002 Raphael House, 250 High Road, Ilford, IG1 1YS
LON/00BC/LDC/2020/0003 · dispensation from consultation · Redbridge · decided 5 Feb 2020
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for installing a fire detection and alarm system and using fire marshals at the block, with no terms imposed, and left payability of the costs open for later determination.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Brigante Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Ian Gibbs Estate Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 154 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 154 residential flats, one commercial unit and a car park
- freeholder
Applicant : Brigante Properties Limited
- agent
managed by [name] Estate Management Limited (‘IGEML’)
- outcome
The tribunal grants dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The tribunal grants the application for dispensation for the Works. No terms are imposed on this grant of dispensation.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.