10 Mathews Court, Highbury Grange, London, N5 2PD
LON/00AU/LSC/2023/0227 · service charges · Islington · decided 5 Jan 2024
The tribunal determined that the leaseholder's share of the 2023/24 cyclical improvement works is 2.56% under the council's points-based apportionment, which it found lawful, and made an order that the council's costs of the proceedings cannot be added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 36 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £17,514.12 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 36 flats
- years
service charges for 2023/2024
- outcome
The Tribunal determines the amount payable by the Applicant in respect of service charges for 2023/2024 relating to works carried out to the block as part of the Respondent’s Cyclical Improvement Programme is 2.56%.
- total demanded
in respect of which the Respondent claims £17,514.12
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an order in favour of the Applicant under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that none of the costs incurred by the Respondent in connection with these proceedings can be added to the service charge.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.