10 Esplanade Seaford East Sussex BN25 1JL
CHI/21UF/LDC/2022/0081 · dispensation from consultation · Lewes · decided 6 Dec 2022
The tribunal refused the RTM company's application to dispense with the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent drainage works, because insufficient evidence of the works, estimates and timescale had been provided.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation refused |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | 10 Esplanade RTM Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | Oakland Property Management |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
currently converted into four self-contained flats
- management company
Applicant : 10 Esplanade RTM Company Ltd
- agent
Representative : Oakland Property Management
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that it will not exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements
- s20
will not exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.