10 Egremont House, Russett Way, London, SE13 7NE
LON/00AL/LSC/2022/0128 · service charges · Greenwich · decided 8 Jul 2024
The tribunal found the estimated service charges for replacement windows, the door entry system and communal lighting, electrics and decoration payable in full, rejecting the leaseholder's argument that they should be reduced because his flat is larger than a one-bedroom flat, and made no order under section 20C.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 50 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
consisted of 50 flats
- years
invoice 10510903 dated 01/04/2023
- outcome
are payable by the Applicant.
- s20c
does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.