10 Eaton Place, London SW1X 8AD
LON/00BK/LAM/2019/0026 · appointment of a manager · Westminster · decided 14 Dec 2020
The tribunal appointed a manager for two years from 1 February 2021 and made a section 20C order, but the text provided ends before the tribunal states its decision on whether the £2,235 legal fees are payable through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Ten Eaton Place Freehold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Susan Metcalfe Residential |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £2,235 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
three leaseholders in a block of three flats all with no shortage
- freeholder
Respondent : Ten Eaton Place Freehold Limited
- agent
instruct [name] Residential (SMR) in place of Burlington from November of 2017
- years
The sum of £2,235 she said had been demanded in the 2017 service charge year when
- total demanded
This invoice is dated 10th January 2017 and is in the sum of £2,235.
- s20c
An order is made under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that the Respondent’s costs before the tribunal shall not be added to the service charges.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.