1 The Leas, Folkstone, Kent, CT20 2DR
CHI/29UL/LAM/2020/0001 · appointment of a manager · Folkestone and Hythe · decided 16 Dec 2020
figures not yet checkedNo plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
“The Freeholder” means Palinbrook Limited and Sandgate Nominees Limited or their successors in title.
- outcome
2. In accordance with s.24(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 the Manager shall be appointed as manager of the Property as from 16th December 2020.
- s20c
Pursuant to s.20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 and on the Tribunal finding it to be just and equitable, the Respondent’s costs for this application shall not be added to the service charges.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.