1 Shirleydale, Harwood Grove, Shirley, Solihull, B90 4AL
BIR/00CT/LIS/2024/0007 · LIS · Solihull · decided 4 Feb 2025
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal found the reserve fund demands for 2021 to 2024 payable and reasonably incurred, said it cannot order refunds of excess funds, and granted the applicants orders that the landlord's tribunal costs cannot be added to the service charge or administration charges.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Abacona Investments Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Cannon Jones Estate Management Ltd. |
| Building | One flat, 72 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 |
| Items in dispute | reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
contain 72 flats, each of which has its
- freeholder
Respondent : Abacona Investments Ltd.
- agent
the managing agents, Cannon [name] Estate Management Ltd. representing the Respondent
- years
service charge years 2021,2022,2023 and the prospective charge for 2024
- outcome
It finds the sums demanded from the Applicants for the service charge reserve fund for the years 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024 to have been payable and reasonably incurred under section 27A of the Act.
- s20c
Accordingly, the Tribunal grants the Applicants the requested order under section 20C of the Act.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.