Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near TN2 5QY

1 Nevill Terrace, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN2 5QY

CHI/29UQ/LDC/2024/0091 · dispensation from consultation · Tunbridge Wells · decided 28 Jun 2024

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent major works to the lintels and cills, subject to the decision being served on all leaseholders, while making no finding on the payability or reasonableness of the costs.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordLong Term Reversions (Torquay) Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentParkfords Management Ltd
BuildingA block, 4 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputemajor works
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
the property contains 4 apartments.
freeholder
Applicant : [name] (Torquay) Ltd
agent
Representative : Parkfords Management Ltd
outcome
I therefore grant dispensation from consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985,
s20
I therefore grant dispensation from consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985,

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.