1 Mountstuart Court, 2 Southcott Road, Teddington, TW11 0BF;

LON/00BD/LSC/2022/0099 · service charges · Richmond upon Thames · decided 17 Apr 2023

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the Applicant liable for the £168 invoice for abortive costs of a visit to remove encroaching belongings, accepted the legal costs of earlier proceedings as reasonable, and made no section 20C order.

Outcome	Payable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Refused
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	Hazelvine Limited
Building	One flat
Service charge years in dispute	2021, 2022
Items in dispute	legal and professional fees, other
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

agent: a Property Manager from Hazelvine Limited who is the appointed Managing Agent
years: for the years 2021/22 and 2022/23
outcome: Accordingly, the Applicant is liable for the sum of £168.
s20c: the Tribunal did not consider it just or equitable to make an order under section 20C of the Act.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.