1 Mountstuart Court, 2 Southcott Road, Teddingotn, TW11 0BF
LON/00BD/LSC/2023/0349 · service charges · Richmond upon Thames · decided 30 Jan 2024
The tribunal decided that service charges of £1,800.22 for July 2021 to June 2022 are not payable by the leaseholder, because her flat was out of use after water leaks from an insured risk, while the roof works charge was held payable; the section 20C and costs applications are to be decided later on written representations.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Sandy Lane Residents Management Co Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, other |
| Total demanded | £6,090 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
4-storey block of 14 flats
- freeholder
Respondent : Sandy Lane Residents Management Co Ltd
- years
for the period July 2021 to the end of June 2022
- outcome
Service charges in the amount of £1,800.22 are not payable by the Applicant
- items reduced
Service charges in the amount of £1,800.22 are not payable by the Applicant
- total demanded
the sum of £6,090 which she said was not payable
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.