1 Fisher Close, Enfield, London EN3 6WQ
LON/00AK/LSC/2021/0197 · service charges · Enfield · decided 2 Nov 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal dismissed the landlord's claim for £250 for removing a bush, along with the associated late payment and legal fees, finding no evidence a bush was present outside the leaseholder's window, so nothing is payable and there is no order for costs.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | ICRI Ltd |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £655 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | no order as to costs |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The tribunal finds that no sums are payable by the respondent to the applicant and the application is dismissed.
- total demanded
£655 administration costs made up of £250 for damages
- total payable
The tribunal finds that no sums are payable by the respondent to the applicant
- costs
The claim is dismissed with no order as to costs.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.